"Most Users" is merely a list of themes used by users themselves. Some designers have many themes. It would be a different classification if there were a list for designers whose themes are used more than others.
2009/4/3 David April <[email protected]> > > um... doesn't the Most Users category do this already? > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Don Dixon <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > It doesn't seem very difficult to me to figure out a solution and to > > implement it. Why not set up a category for "Top Designers" or > > "Popular Designers". Google could establish the criteria, say > > designers who have a certain number of people using their themes. > > That demonstrates that they can create themes that people want to > > use. This would give new designers an incentive to develop good > > themes to have their themes placed into the category. Doing this > > would then make good themes more discoverable. It would be easier for > > people to find good themes. The "Hottest" themes category does not > > meet this need. It is of some value but there are many good themes > > that are covered up in this mess. The idea of allowing people to > > create themes and put them online is a good one but it is being > > managed poorly and is quite a mess. > > > > On Apr 2, 11:37 am, Elite Designs <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Kathleen, > >> > >> We already suggested what Google can do to make the theme Designers > >> with experience more discoverable. The new themes from novice theme > >> developers especially using the theme creator from Google are adding a > >> bunch of trash. For example the "John Wayne Gacy" theme set up just > >> lately. I most certainly don't want my theme bunched with that > >> completely disgusting trash. I see Google had no problems creating a > >> "Game Theme" category so what is the problem with setting a category > >> with EXPERIENCED THEME DESIGNERS category? Google just in not coming > >> up with a good enough reason to this question! > >> > >> Thank you Tamara > >> > >> On Mar 26, 11:21 am, [email protected] wrote: > >> > >> > iGoogle been inspired from the start with all the great themes you > >> > guys have created, and we're excited with all the new themes coming > >> > in. It allows our users even more freedom to customize their page. We > >> > realize as more and more themes come in, themes become a bit more > >> > difficult to find. We're definitely looking into ways for making > >> > themes more discoverable. > >> > >> > On Mar 22, 1:18 am, "www.abuawad.com" <[email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> > >> > > نسخة في الغة العربية > >> > >> > > 2009/3/20, John Barreiro <[email protected]>: > >> > >> > > > I agree. > >> > > > John Barreiro > >> > > > El Cerrito, California > >> > >> > > >http://www.larpman.com > >> > > >http://pbase.com/larpman > >> > > > [email protected] > >> > >> > > > On Mar 20, 2009, at 6:47 AM, Don Dixon wrote: > >> > >> > > > If Google is going to permit the whole world to submit anything > they > >> > > > want at the click of a cursor, pictures of girlfriends, foreheads, > >> > > > poor quality photos, narrow screens, poor taste, etc., then the > least > >> > > > they could do is create a category for experienced designers who > do > >> > > > create wide screen themes that match. That way our themes > wouldn't be > >> > > > buried in all this other stuff. And maybe that would give some an > >> > > > incentive to learn how to really make a theme. > >> > >> > > -- > >> > > (abuawad) -(khmmd) > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Themes API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-themes-api?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
