On 2011/04/05 14:19:32, schenney wrote:
The work for UmbrellaException is rolled in here because testing
relies on the
RPC test framework, which is not present in the Event testing code.
The
UmbrellaException code could be placed in a separate changelist if we
created
Exceptions-specific classes out the TestSetFactory and TestSetValidtor
code. I'm
happy to do that if it is considered worthwhile - I tend to think not.

At this point, it probably doesn't make sense to go redo it.  But going
forward it probably doesn't make sense for the RPC tests should be a
catch-all for everything that can be serialized.  For non-collections
stuff, TestSetFactory / TestSetValidator is really a lot more
infrastructure than you really need anyway.  It makes sense that the RPC
system tests the core JRE classes (which don't, themselves, depend on
RPC), but for other unrelated subsystems they should probably be
separated out.  Anyway, I'm rambling, I think it's fine to commit as is.


http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1395804/diff/8001/user/test/com/google/gwt/user/client/rpc/ExceptionsTestService.java
File user/test/com/google/gwt/user/client/rpc/ExceptionsTestService.java
(right):

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1395804/diff/8001/user/test/com/google/gwt/user/client/rpc/ExceptionsTestService.java#newcode23
user/test/com/google/gwt/user/client/rpc/ExceptionsTestService.java:23:
public interface ExceptionsTestService extends RemoteService {
Googling.... it's @RemoteServiceRelativePath.  The other tests are all
older than the annotation.

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1395804/

--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

Reply via email to