On 2011/05/09 21:06:01, zhuyi wrote:
On 2011/04/18 18:56:30, Stephen Chenney wrote:
>
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1380807/diff/11003/user/test/com/google/gwt/user/client/rpc/FinalFieldsTestService.java
> File
user/test/com/google/gwt/user/client/rpc/FinalFieldsTestService.java
> (right):
>
>
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1380807/diff/11003/user/test/com/google/gwt/user/client/rpc/FinalFieldsTestService.java#newcode27
>
user/test/com/google/gwt/user/client/rpc/FinalFieldsTestService.java:27:
public
> class FinalFieldsNode implements IsSerializable {
> On 2011/04/18 17:39:35, zhuyi wrote:
> > On 2011/04/18 14:18:10, bobv wrote:
> > > Use Serializable instead of IsSerializable.
> >
> > Done.
>
> I disagree. The legacy serialization policy requires IsSerializable,
and the
> server JUnit tests use the legacy policy (because they do not set up
a
> serialization whitelist file). To make this class useful in server
side tests,
I
> would like it to be IsSerializable. I had to do that for some other
test class
> so I could use it in my tests.
I think we should revert it back to IsSerializable for backward
compatibility?
SGTM.
Stephen.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1380807/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
