I wasn't aware of this case. Yes, that should obviously be taken into account. And as an aside the Reps agreement should be looked at as well in cases like this to make sure it's not something we're being too aggressive on.
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Axel Hecht <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/4/13 11:29 PM, Majken Connor wrote: > >> Reps sign NDAs, maybe we can have some sort of formal agreement in this >> case as well that touches on the appropriate use of this trusted >> communication group. >> > > We have at least one incident where the reps NDA actually led to a > conflict between the contributor's real-life NDAs and what reps asked him > to sign. > > We should be really careful to not establish restrictions to this group > that block people we trust from being part of this group. > > Axel > > _______________________________________________ > governance mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance > _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
