Yes, I was going to say what Dolske said. We have requirements for Reps, you have to have a profile picture that shows your face, because people need to be able to recognize you. By definition you're volunteering to be Mozilla's representative in the region so there are certain expectations. I think it's also fair to set certain expectations of peers and module owners. Especially now that you can change what information is public or private, people won't have to choose to pare down their information to make their basic info public.
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Justin Dolske <[email protected]> wrote: > On 1/10/14 9:33 PM, Mook wrote: > > Note that not all Mozillians profiles are public; of the owners and >> peers in that module, you two have public profiles and the other two are >> private (as in, they cannot be seen without logging in). This means >> that it would probably be a good idea to at least have an email address >> in addition to links to Mozillians profiles; after all, people new to >> the community probably shouldn't get vouched for access to private >> profiles. >> > > Or, conversely, we could expect that peers/owners have public profiles (or > semi-public, there are varying degrees). From a new-contributor > perspective, it seems a little weird and unwelcoming to have module leaders > who are invisible beyond a name and email. > > Justin > > _______________________________________________ > governance mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance > _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
