Modules aren't *all* bugzilla centric. Also, simply adding someone's email to a bug request isn't always a sufficient form of contact to get attention.
An interesting option is to move the module owner/peers lists to Mozillians, now that groups can be curated. The Module list and descriptions can still live in the wiki, but they can link to a related Mozillians group for the information about the people leading the module. On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Tim Abraldes <[email protected]> wrote: > From the discussion so far, it sounds like: > A) The main reason for having a modules page at all is so that > contributors can find appropriate reviewers for their patches > B) To this end, listing peer/owner bugmail addresses is sufficient, > but linking to Mozillians.org profiles is more friendly/welcoming/human > C) So that the modules page accomplishes its main goal in A), any > owner/peer who chooses to link to her/his Mozillians.org profile should > make sure that her/his bugmail is listed and public on her/his profile. > Additionally, it might be helpful for Mozillians.org to list "Bugzilla > (BMO)" account in the same section as email address and IRC nick. > > I haven't been able to really gauge the level of support (or lack of > support) for linking Mozillians.org profiles vs just using email addresses. > If people are generally in favor of Mozillians.org profile links, we > could put a message to owners/peers on the wiki saying something like > "Please consider using a link to your Mozillians.org profile > (example_link_goes_here) instead of just your bugmail address." > If people are more divided, the message could be more like "Please > enter your email address ([email protected]) or a link to your > Mozillians profile (example_link_goes_here)" > > > A separate issue has been raised - creating a mechanism to audit whether > code has received review from an appropriate module peer/owner - which > is only somewhat related to the issue that this thread addresses. The > connection is that whatever auditing system is created would also > probably be responsible for generating the modules page. I think that > that is a valuable discussion worth having, but in a separate thread. > I'm creating a thread titled "Service to Maintain Module Peer/Owner > Information and Audit Check-Ins" for that purpose. > > > _______________________________________________ > governance mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance > > _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
