On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Rubén Martín <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Even this time there was a (at least for me) clear article about the > changes > <http://identity.mozilla.com/post/78873831485/transitioning-persona-to-community-ownership> > on Persona, most people I read or that have pinged me think the project > is dead and there is no point on keep promoting it any more. > > Quoting Daring Fireball > <http://daringfireball.net/linked/2014/03/09/persona>: > >> "Transitioning to Community Ownership" is Mozilla-speak for "It's >> dead, Jim." > > Why people have this perception? Is it accurate? Can we do something to > change it? > > From the article I understand this is just a change on ownership, from > full time employees to volunteers (including some employees), but it > seems people don't see it like that or don't have faith on these kind of > announcements. > > Maybe can we show successful examples on ownership changes from > employees to volunteers at Mozilla to prove them wrong. > > Regards. > > PS: The use of "Community" in the article it's probably unfortunate > since employee ownership is also community ownership ;) > > -- > Rubén Martín [Nukeador] > Mozilla Reps Mentor > http://www.mozilla-hispano.org > http://twitter.com/mozilla_hispano > http://facebook.com/mozillahispano > > > _______________________________________________ > governance mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance >
It's worth remembering that Mozilla itself was basically transitioned to community ownership at one point by AOL/Netscape. - Kyle _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
