On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 22:45 +0100, Rubén Martín wrote: > Hi, > > Even this time there was a (at least for me) clear article about the > changes > <http://identity.mozilla.com/post/78873831485/transitioning-persona-to-community-ownership> > on Persona, most people I read or that have pinged me think the project > is dead and there is no point on keep promoting it any more. > > Quoting Daring Fireball > <http://daringfireball.net/linked/2014/03/09/persona>: > > > "Transitioning to Community Ownership" is Mozilla-speak for "It's > > dead, Jim." > > Why people have this perception? Is it accurate? Can we do something to > change it?
I think that the best way to prove these type of rants wrong is... well prove them wrong. If we have some new features developed in Persona (for instance the long awaited integration in the browser that would make Persona a really decentralized auth solution) it would be good enough proof that "transition to community" doesn't mean it's dead. Especially if these new features lead to further adoption. > PS: The use of "Community" in the article it's probably unfortunate > since employee ownership is also community ownership ;) +1. We should really stop making this distinction. We are all Mozilla community. The transition is from employees to volunteers, within the same community. ~nikos _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
