Tim, You have a point, so let me add some more details. It is true that the official Mozilla blog lacked reactions before Brendan's resignation and that the press release you mention was, well, not very good. Most at Mozilla are quite unhappy about both facts.
However, in its majority, Mozilla stood by Brendan Eich from the start. Just look at our blog aggregator (http://planet.mozilla.org), which is the de facto voice of the Mozilla community. You'll have to scroll back a few days to see what happened before Brendan's resignation, but you will find plenty of support (including mine) being voiced without ambiguity for Brendan's position of CEO and right to express himself. You will also see that the authors come from just about everywhere, and that they supported Brendan regardless of their political views. Do you think I have missed something? Best regards, David On 4/8/14 12:16 AM, [email protected] wrote: > David Rajchenbach-Teller's explanation may technically true but the fact is > that Mozilla could have stood by Mr. Eich from the start rather than > presenting that ridiculous press release. You could have immediately > supported Mr. Eich and his constitutional rights. David Rajchenbach-Teller > should at least have the guts to tell the truth rather than lie using some > truths. > I guess I will need to change browsers. You do realize that the vast majority > of your users don't live in the bay area or in NYC and are disgusted by this > man needing to step down or whatever euphemism you want to use for forcing > him out. > > Tim Cates > _______________________________________________ > governance mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance > -- David Rajchenbach-Teller, PhD Performance Team, Mozilla _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
