I just want to mention again (did it go through the first time?) that many teams besides Reps need a formal agreement to allow volunteers to take on responsibilities and leadership and to allow them to be in on sensitive information. This agreement as it is written seems like it would be intended for that purpose. Because it seems so far off from the purpose stated when it was shared, it seems to make sense to keep this agreement and tweak it for the purpose it suits.
It seems like it would be better to take the community guidelines as a starting point for a more general "welcome, this is how we do things here" (and isn't that what the guidelines are anyway? Would we really need a new document or just to start putting the guidelines in front of people?) On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Robert Kaiser <[email protected]> wrote: > Rubén Martín schrieb: > > So as I understand David's explanation, this is not an "agreement", it's a >> summary of all the structure, rules and community agreements we have, so >> new people is aware of all the information in one place. >> > > Then we probably should name and phrase it more that way. ;-) > > KaiRo > > > > _______________________________________________ > governance mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance > _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
