On 2014-06-24, 3:50 PM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Benjamin Smedberg
<[email protected]> wrote:


I think the big problem that everyone here has with the "agreement" is that
it's phrased as an agreement with all sorts of legal language, and yet it's
not actually a binding legal contract.

So overall, I think the current proposal is a big mistake, and you need to
go back to the drawing board and come up with something different.

I agree. If I were a new contributor and somebody put this agreement
in front of me, I would find it surprising, confusing and off-putting.
It's a barrier to participation.

Seconded.

It's not clear to me what problem this agreement is meant to be solving.

That is a mystery to me as well.

Cheers,
Ehsan

_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance

Reply via email to