Hi I appreciate the think Denelle needs to weigh in on this Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 15, 2014, at 7:28 PM, Lawrence Mandel <[email protected]> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- >> For a while, there hasn't been a clear decision-maker about data >> collection practices within Firefox. This includes lack of clarity about >> who needs to approve changes to Firefox Health Report, as well as >> uncertainty about what privacy review means and who can "do" a privacy >> review. To clarify this and streamline the decision-making process, I am >> proposing to own a policy module for this: >> >> Policy Module: Firefox Data Collection >> Description: Firefox Data Collection is responsible for the data that >> Firefox sends back to Mozilla. This includes reviewing both data quality >> and privacy, and approving new types of pings and measurements. This >> encompasses measurements included in the current Firefox Health Report, >> Telemetry, and crash-stats, as well as other data that Firefox sends >> back such as update and blocklist pings. >> Owner: Benjamin Smedberg >> Peers: Taras Glek >> More information about decision-making: >> https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/Data_Collection >> >> I'm specifically limiting this to Firefox; it does not include Firefox >> OS. I think Firefox OS should have a clear decision-maker about its >> product data collection, but I am not that person. >> >> I am open to suggestions/nominations for additional peers. > > I have worked with Jishnu Menon quite extensively on data collection and > retention policy for Telemetry. John Jensen also has been working on policy > for FHR. I would nominate both of them as peers of this module. If you are > looking for more help, I think I have significant enough experience with > Telemetry where I can help here as well. > > Lawrence _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
