#191: represent PCORI CDM 2.x terminology as i2b2 metadata
-----------------------+------------------------
Reporter: dconnolly | Owner: dconnolly
Type: problem | Status: new
Priority: medium | Milestone:
Component: data-stds | Resolution:
Keywords: | Blocked By: 109
Blocking: 317 |
-----------------------+------------------------
Comment (by dconnolly):
Thanks for the experience report.
On process...
Replying to [comment:7 nateapathy]:
> ... My understanding from comment:3 on this ticket is that we would be
adopting the SCILHS ontology as a group - I did not think the decision was
still up for debate.
Well, your experience report aligns with my expectation that adopting
SCILHS would be cost-effective overall, but where it overlaps with designs
we have already adopted, for example demographics (#67),
[wiki:DataRepositoryManagement#design-process due process] involves re-
opening such tickets and then closing them again.
I probably should have started to do that by now but I have been reluctant
on behalf of dev groups (such as KUMC!) that have investment in the
existing design. (see also
[https://informatics.kumc.edu/work/wiki/SemanticWeb#TerminologyEvolution
terminology evolution].)
This whole SCHILS business really shouldn't be hiding under this CDM 2.x
ticket at all. I just haven't managed to re-organize tickets properly.
Here's hoping for time to do so.
--
Ticket URL:
<http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/191#comment:8>
gpc-informatics <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/>
Greater Plains Network - Informatics
_______________________________________________
Gpc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
