#191: represent PCORI CDM 2.x terminology as i2b2 metadata
-----------------------+------------------------
 Reporter:  dconnolly  |       Owner:  dconnolly
     Type:  problem    |      Status:  new
 Priority:  medium     |   Milestone:
Component:  data-stds  |  Resolution:
 Keywords:             |  Blocked By:  109
 Blocking:  317        |
-----------------------+------------------------

Comment (by nateapathy):

 Our implementation effort estimation ended up being much more than the
 actual work effort, which was very reassuring. The SCILHS ontology, due to
 its limited granularity, is pretty straightforward to implement, and
 follows best practices for i2b2 design, which makes it easier to
 implement. In terms of mapping our hierarchies and terms to the SCILHS
 ontology hierarchies and terms, that effort which we thought would be
 monumental, was actually not nearly as cumbersome as we thought, largely
 because we were already fairly well aligned since (specifically for
 demographics) Cerner i2b2 uses the standard i2b2 demographic ontology, and
 the SCILHS ontology sticks fairly closely to that design. Granted, the
 ease of that transition was due in large part to our local standard
 following the i2b2 standard pretty tightly, so the degree to which on a
 site has deviated from the i2b2 standard ontologies will be a good proxy
 for work effort to align with SCILHS.

--
Ticket URL: 
<http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/191#comment:10>
gpc-informatics <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/>
Greater Plains Network - Informatics
_______________________________________________
Gpc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev

Reply via email to