#191: represent PCORI CDM 2.x terminology as i2b2 metadata
-----------------------+------------------------
Reporter: dconnolly | Owner: dconnolly
Type: problem | Status: new
Priority: medium | Milestone:
Component: data-stds | Resolution:
Keywords: | Blocked By: 109
Blocking: 317 |
-----------------------+------------------------
Comment (by lv):
Is the idea that we'll need CDM v3 compliance earlier than the SCILHS
timeline (end of the year for v2.1/3), which could provide an opportunity
to contribute our work?
Can either KUMC or NateA comment in a general way on the effort required
to implement the SCILHS work?
I agree with following one standard rather than creating our own hybrid.
If the level of granularity is requied, maybe we should advocate for
including it in their later release?
--
Ticket URL:
<http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/191#comment:9>
gpc-informatics <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/>
Greater Plains Network - Informatics
_______________________________________________
Gpc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
