Yes, I expect that helps considerably, Jeff. -- Dan
________________________________________ From: Klann, Jeffrey G. [[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:21 AM To: Dan Connolly; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [gpc-informatics] #191: represent PCORI CDM 2.x terminology as i2b2 metadata I can call in tomorrow 9/22. Can¹t make it the 29th. I hope that helps! Jeff On 9/16/15, 4:51 PM, "Dan Connolly" <[email protected]> wrote: >Jeff, > >We're interested to compare a few different approaches to ETL around i2b2 >and CDM. We'd like you (and/or other folks knowledgeable about the SCILHS >approach) to join us at our next weekly meeting(s): Tuesdays, 11am >central time (noon Eastern, if I've done my timezone math correctly). The >next one is Sep 22, but the discussion is likely to continue into our Sep >29 meeting. How does that work for you? > >I'll also send an iCalendar invitation... > >-- >Dan > >________________________________________ >From: Klann, Jeffrey G. [[email protected]] >Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 1:42 PM >To: [email protected]; Dan Connolly; [email protected]; >[email protected] >Subject: RE: [gpc-informatics] #191: represent PCORI CDM 2.x terminology >as i2b2 metadata > >I've been getting these emails and this is great news that you've found >our ontology easy to leverage. Let me know if I can be of any help. > >FYI, I'd be happy to integrate/accept your improvements into our ontology >release if they align. What are the improvements? LOINC mappings? > >Also fyi, our timeline for CDMv3 is also soon - 10/1 (except for some >small sections like the trial table). The Google Drive that we've shared >with collaborators already has CDMv3 ontologies for everything except >PRO, Death, Trial, and Harvest. (I imagine Dan and co have seen this.) We >are using modifiers to distinguish Diagnosis from Condition and >Prescribed from Dispensed, so these are not separate trees. > >Thanks! > >Jeffrey Klann, PhD >Instructor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School >Assistant in Computer Science, Massachusetts General Hospital >PhD in Research, Partners Healthcare Research Computing >ofc: 617-643-5879 >email: [email protected] > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: GPC Informatics [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 1:00 PM >> To: [email protected]; [email protected]; >> [email protected] >> Cc: [email protected]; Klann, Jeffrey G. >> Subject: Re: [gpc-informatics] #191: represent PCORI CDM 2.x >> terminology as i2b2 metadata >> >> #191: represent PCORI CDM 2.x terminology as i2b2 metadata >> -----------------------+------------------------ >> Reporter: dconnolly | Owner: dconnolly >> Type: problem | Status: new >> Priority: medium | Milestone: >> Component: data-stds | Resolution: >> Keywords: | Blocked By: 109 >> Blocking: 317 | >> -----------------------+------------------------ >> >> Comment (by nateapathy): >> >> Our implementation effort estimation ended up being much more than the >> actual work effort, which was very reassuring. The SCILHS ontology, due >> to its limited granularity, is pretty straightforward to implement, >> and follows best practices for i2b2 design, which makes it easier to >> implement. In terms of mapping our hierarchies and terms to the SCILHS >> ontology hierarchies and terms, that effort which we thought would be >> monumental, was actually not nearly as cumbersome as we thought, >> largely because we were already fairly well aligned since >> (specifically for >> demographics) Cerner i2b2 uses the standard i2b2 demographic ontology, >> and the SCILHS ontology sticks fairly closely to that design. Granted, >> the ease of that transition was due in large part to our local >> standard following the i2b2 standard pretty tightly, so the degree to >> which on a site has deviated from the i2b2 standard ontologies will be >> a good proxy for work effort to align with SCILHS. >> >> -- >> Ticket URL: >> <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/191#comment:10> >> gpc-informatics <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/> >> Greater Plains Network - Informatics > > >The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it >is >addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the >e-mail >contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance >HelpLine at >http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in >error >but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and >properly >dispose of the e-mail. _______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
