-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Peter Machell
Sent: Tuesday, 31 January 2006 6:37 PM
To: General Practice Computing Group Talk
Subject: Re: [GPCG_TALK] File repair utility in MD2


>>I wonder if this is the basis for Peter Machell's report about the
>>slowdown in MD3 rollout by HCN?

Could be. Tried again today to get MDW3 for a couple of sites (against my
advice) and HCN will not return my emails.

It does explain the two sites I have converted, then rolled back because of
missing documents, and in one case of documents linked to the wrong
patients.

It didn't take all that long to find missing documents in both cases, so we
were either very lucky or the fault is a common one.

Peter.
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk


Peter

So it seems more people have noticed these missing document.  I believe that
had HCN not changed the way the FRU works 2-3 years ago (ie. Removing
documents from being checked) and if they "forced" all MD2 users to monthly
fo a full FRU then file corruption, documents in wrong patients and missing
data would not have been a big issue.  It sounds like patients documents
being in wrong patients file is due to sync. errors between internal ID's of
respective databases.  Is similar to defraging your HD regularly

Cedric



_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to