Andrew N. Shrosbree wrote: > Tim, > > Ross proposed a model for WebService based messaging very similar to NeHTA's > because we hearitly endorse their choice of this technology. > > The objectives of the model articulated by Ross are: > > - to facilitate interoperability (actually, makes it an imperative) > > - to offer an alternative to the hub-based approach favoured by > commercial providers, while creating an infrastructure which they can link > into, > thereby protecting their right to charge customers who are willing to pay > > - to cater to the practical challenges facing GPs (and sole > practitioners) in a producer/consumer model, like WebServices. > > For further details, please contact me or Ross offline for more detailed > docco.
OK, thanks, glad to hear that. In fact, that's what I would have thought because I have heard Ross outline those plans in other meetings. Hence my surprise when Tom Bowden suggested that Ross had voiced ideas which did not accord with the NEHTA framework. Tim C > Tim Churches wrote: >> Andrew N. Shrosbree wrote: >> >>> Tom, >>> >>> You evidently did not understand a word of what Ross said at the conference. >>> >> >> What did Ross say at the conference? >> >> Tim C >> _______________________________________________ >> Gpcg_talk mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk >> > -- > Andrew N. Shrosbree B.Sc, B.Ec > Technical Director > ArgusConnect Pty Ltd > http://www.argusconnect.com.au > Suite 4, Greenhill Centre, Mt Helen > Victoria, Australia > Tel: +61 (0)3 5335 2214 > Mob: +61 (0)415 645 291 > Skype: andrewshroz > > _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
