On 22/05/2006, at 6:33 PM, Andrew McIntyre wrote:
Hello Horst,
While EMail will work most of the time, its our experience that users
do want realtime delivery and the order of delivery is important as
well.
<snip>
The EMail headers for the quoted message tell it all
Whilst I don't necessarily disagree, to be fair, there is something
very wrong with your example, and I'd wager it's the involvement of
Telstra.
Since moving this list, I can't recall seeing a message take more
than a minute to get through to me. Your message transaction was
completed within 27 seconds, assuming all clocks are correct:
Received: from ozdocit.org (85-10-195-135.clients.your-server.de
[85.10.195.135]) by host2.mobilecomputing.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 90E8B979B9 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 22 May 2006
18:33:49 +1000 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain
[127.0.0.1]) by ozdocit.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96CCDEDC15B; Mon,
22 May 2006 18:33:29 +1000 (EST)
Received: from sv1.medical-objects.com.au (sv1.medical-
objects.com.au [203.219.13.241]) by ozdocit.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 4A73DEDC14F for <[email protected]>; Mon, 22 May 2006 18:33:27
+1000 (EST)
Received: from 192.168.0.122 (unknown [192.168.0.122]) by
sv1.medical-objects.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6DA2C3F9; Mon, 22
May 2006 18:33:22 +1000 (EST)
Of course the presently unavoidable involvement of Telstra in
Australian email is a very good argument for real time systems.....
Peter.
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
