<big snip> I love the way path services are deemed generic enough that > you can "force" them to install their software for you your > way and provide support on your terms or you'll take your bat > and ball and go elsewhere to someome who does it your way. I > guess thats the harsh reality of life. <end snip>
You "path" people only have the likes of Fetch to blame for this state of affairs. The big path companies have oodles of money and they come up with such a crappy product (fetch) I'm suprised Microsoft haven't claimed it as their own. Little old QML has had the neatest, smallest most efficient download app for years that just works wherever I LET them install it. Yes I said LET them install it. I control the network not some 3rd party pathology company who IS REPLACABLE ! (sorry JP this is the market you have gotten yourself into :) <another big snip> Is there really significant issues with "server crashes" (meaning nonfuntioning servers) as a result of misbehaving download apps or is this more FUD being spread... <end huge snip> Q. How do you make a server really reliable ? A. Don't install any software or apps on it. Reality; install a little as possible. Outcome: Path downloaders go on PC's - PERIOD. Andrew Cameron. Gold Coast. Disclaimer: I have no affiliations with QML I just think their downloader is great and SteveO is what all path company support guys should be like. Disclaimer2: I have signed an agreement of understanding with Healthlink. _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
