Adrian Elliot-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > a better system would be one in which "free text" type entries occurred > but you then highlighted the reason and right clicked or similar to > interrogate the code entry dictionary. a less arbitrary coding system than > Docle > would be an incentive to use it too (as would reliable preservation of the > coding when moving to other software) .
Yes, and that's very similar to what Jon Patrick's group at Sydney Uni have been working on. They still have a lot of work to do and many bells and whistles to add, but what they have already done shows real promise, I think. Tim C _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
