On 05/01/2007, at 10:14 PM, gspurge wrote:

Peter Machell wrote:
Except for the fact that web forums suck for discussions.
Peter,
That is your opinion and one which you are entitled to. You may be unaware that a MD betatester cancelled his subscription to this list as he could not cope with the amount of incoming mail in his inbox. He is however helpful in discussing MD on the Ausgp (and HCN) web based forums. Each to their own I guess.

I can understand that. The postings on this list are often over my head, and sometimes I don't have enough time to properly digest them. However, that's what inbox sub-folders and rules are for. Also, this list is probably not a good place for someone mainly interested in discussing MD.

Also, as previously discussed, ausgp.com is owned by an employee of a medical software company.

And you, who are associated with the administration of this site, run an IT support company which provides services to members of this list. I don't think anyone is questioning your motives. I for one am happy to believe that motives of the Ausgp administrators are appropriate. Have seen nothing to suggest otherwise.

That's great. I hope it continues without bias.
There's room for these forums and a mailing list, per package. It's not a contest.

Peter.

_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to