On 05/01/2007, at 10:14 PM, gspurge wrote:
Peter Machell wrote:
Except for the fact that web forums suck for discussions.
Peter,
That is your opinion and one which you are entitled to. You may be
unaware that a MD betatester cancelled his subscription to this
list as he could not cope with the amount of incoming mail in his
inbox. He is however helpful in discussing MD on the Ausgp (and
HCN) web based forums. Each to their own I guess.
I can understand that. The postings on this list are often over my
head, and sometimes I don't have enough time to properly digest them.
However, that's what inbox sub-folders and rules are for. Also, this
list is probably not a good place for someone mainly interested in
discussing MD.
Also, as previously discussed, ausgp.com is owned by an employee
of a medical software company.
And you, who are associated with the administration of this site,
run an IT support company which provides services to members of
this list. I don't think anyone is questioning your motives. I for
one am happy to believe that motives of the Ausgp administrators
are appropriate. Have seen nothing to suggest otherwise.
That's great. I hope it continues without bias.
There's room for these forums and a mailing list, per package. It's
not a contest.
Peter.
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk