Richard Hosking wrote: > Obviously beyond the capabilities of an amateur. Still they have a focus > on open source and open standards, though a commercial vendor/developer > is requested. > What would be involved in such a venture?
Maybe something like this: http://matrix.squiz.net/ Developed in Sydney, professionally supported, all code behind it is available under an open source license and it uses open source components, in use by lots of big clients, looks like the goods to me. Elizabeth Dodd wrote: > this would be a tough bit > we've been discussing this for eons without resolution > > 2.1.15 Integration with external systems and applications > This CMS must interact with existing medical software. > Mechanisms for > achieving this must be fully documented and based where > possible on > open or > industry standards, or in consultation with clinical software > developers and the > management group. It is envisaged that this will be XML with > clinical indexes. > Support for Electronic Decision Support standards is a likely > future requirement. I suspect that they won't get that without lots of custom development work, in which case they'll need deep pockets, probably deeper than they've got. But some partial solution to what they wish for might be possible or affordable. Tim C _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
