On Thu, March 29, 2007 11:18 am, Simon James said: >> Well, one well-known chap has started a new medical software suite in >> the past >> couple of years, built ostensibly "from the ground up" and had the >> chance to >> differentiate it'self and become cross-platform.. > > And he chose to develop his product for an OS with.....customers! > > www.pmsc.com.au (which launched about a year ago) also went the Windows > route (using FireBird)
They don't mention Windows in their system requirements - I'd assume they don't know other platforms exist, except that a Mac is part of their banner on their website and advertising. > and I haven't seen anything to suggest > www.stathealth.com.au will buck the trend when they launch "in the second > half of 2007". I don't think that ensuring a new system can be cross platform when it is developed is an unrealistic expectation, particularly if these software houses want to be around for the next decade. I think they are just used to a point and click development environment like Visual Studio or the CA thing Frank uses, and they probably discuss this for all of a minute in their founding meetings - "What development environment should we use? I'm used to XYZ. OK, that means we'll be Windows only. No problem, 95% of the world is Windows only." They assume that the Linux, Mac and other non-MS communities are only early-adaptors and geeks. This is an old assumption that is becoming less true as time goes by. The release of Vista is the best thing to happen for these communities in ages, and that figure of 95% is already on a slippery downhill slope. Peter. _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
