thanks again that is what we are planing _____
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Sent: Friday, 22 June 2007 7:36 PM To: 'General Practice Computing Group Talk' Subject: RE: [GPCG_TALK] Spectrum Classic to Medical Director conversion Sit tight with PractiX. If you have issues with support/training contact stathealth and get on their premium support plan for PractiX then Wait for the new product. IBA have frozen all development of PractiX apparently, they expect everyone to happily jump across to Monet, their favoured product. Nearly all the good support/development staff have left IBA=MSS and gone to stathealth. There is only 1 developer left at logan apparently. A client asked today why she would pay IBA $5k for support for the coming year, it was hard to argue with that thought considering they have been getting no support and the call centre has moved to India. It will all be fine till something goes wrong I guess. Andrew.C From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dr John Van Dyck Sent: Friday, 22 June 2007 12:09 PM To: 'General Practice Computing Group Talk' Subject: RE: [GPCG_TALK] Spectrum Classic to Medical Director conversion what would your recommendation be Peter (apart from Genie :-))?? I am in this exact situation having joined a group using Practix. _____ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Machell Sent: Friday, 22 June 2007 11:42 AM To: General Practice Computing Group Talk Cc: Div Yorke Jane Ford Subject: Re: [GPCG_TALK] Spectrum Classic to Medical Director conversion On 22/06/2007, at 11:25 AM, Mark Evans wrote: Peter, I am not recommending "the most popular system" nor am I promoting HCN products. I simply have a request for help that I am trying to facilitate. It is the practices choice to go to MD3 and they are having difficulty migrating their data. I hope that is not too selfish of me. Mark, I didn't suggest that you were, but from what I see of divisions up here, they strongly recommend Medical Director and Pracsoft for reasons that can only be described as selfish. We recommend those products too, in some cases, but they would certainly not be my pick for a site used to MSS. I agree with interoperability between packages for porting information and helping GPs make informed decisions about what clinical packages to use. Well done then! Peter.
_______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
