Yes I agree, a decent ADSL2 plan is about $59-69 with 10-20 gig downloads. Even clients with above decent ADSL plans with 20gig downloads caps can't open up WSUS on a new 2003 server as it will pull down 20-30gig overnight.
Andrew.C -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Twyford Sent: Wednesday, 27 June 2007 12:10 PM To: General Practice Computing Group Talk Subject: Re: [GPCG_TALK] B4H James wrote: > Hi Greg > > RE 512/128 $40 a month plan > I agree that is all that is needed though think anyone that can have a $39 > adsl2+ plan like should think about it. It makes online patches and update > occur in seconds rather than minutes. James, And the monthly download included in that plan, and the rate per MB once the limit is exceeded? No reputable, read scores well at whirlpool/Broadband Choice, ISP offers such a plan that I know of. Are you sure that one isn't a come on? Greg > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Greg Twyford > Sent: Wednesday, 27 June 2007 11:07 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; General Practice Computing Group Talk > Subject: Re: [GPCG_TALK] B4H > > Oliver Frank wrote: >> James wrote: >> >>> A internet plan and the B4H subsidy/incentive are two separate things. >> I know that. >> >>> Internode would be happy to supply your services for ever. >> I know that too, and intend to keep using Internode when the BFH subsidy >> ends. However, when that happens, I will downgrade our plan with >> Internode to the slowest cheapest one available, because the relatively >> fast (for Australia) and expensive one that BFH pays for is much more >> than we actually need. >> > > Oliver, > > Absolutely correct. > > There was never any realistic scopng about what GPs would need or use > when B4H was set-up. Lots of mumbo-jumbo about telemedicine and high-end > stuff no one is doing, the need for business grade connections and > carrier-level firewalls, with subsequent admissions that you should > always rely on your own security anyway. > > A few GPs have made use of the static IP address for VPNs and remote > access, but the majority would be served by the 512/128 $40 a month plan > I've recommended to a number of practices, and that I use myself. > > Greg -- Greg Twyford Information Management & Technology Program Officer Canterbury Division of General Practice E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph.: 02 9787 9033 Fax: 02 9787 9200 PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL *********************************************************************** The information contained in this e-mail and their attached files, including replies and forwarded copies, are confidential and intended solely for the addressee(s) and may be legally privileged or prohibited from disclosure and unauthorised use. If you are not the intended recipient, any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and/or publication or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance upon this message or its attachments is prohibited. All liability for viruses is excluded to the fullest extent permitted by law. *********************************************************************** _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
