>-- Original Message -- >From: Horst Herb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: General Practice Computing Group Talk <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: [GPCG_TALK] B4H >Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:49:32 +1000 >Reply-To: General Practice Computing Group Talk <[email protected]> > > >On Wednesday 27 June 2007, Oliver Frank wrote: >> > As you can see, I didn't avail myself of the B4H offer - it >> > just didn't seem necessary to me. >> >> I do feel a bit guilty for wasting public money by applying for a faster >> service than we need, > >Yes, one should feel guilty with B4H. >
We pay $158 per month and have no access to the software/security which our (we own it) Cisco Modem. We recently wanted to setup VOIP but have been excluded due to security fears at the controlling ISP. We plan to leave when contract is up and get Exetel as offered by our local reseller. He will also connect VOIP with a connection box to our PABX. We have costed this to be the cheapest of all available options once our B4H plan expires. (March '08). felicity Goswell >Because if you study the market you will find that you get much better deals > >than any of the B4H rip-off plans on the free market. Costs peanuts, as >opposed to the real money B4H rip-offs cost the taxpayer. > >Horst >_______________________________________________ >Gpcg_talk mailing list >[email protected] >http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
