> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Mackenzie
> As you can see, I didn't avail myself of the B4H offer - it > just didn't seem necessary to me. I do feel a bit guilty for wasting public money by applying for a faster service than we need, but: a) I pay a lot tax and therefore felt some entitlement to receive some benefit in exchange for this; and b) I wanted to get my practice's Internet connection free if the government was offering to pay for it. I feel that the BFH offer should have provided a fixed amount (e.g. enough to pay for a basic ADSL plan) to practices to subsidise any Internet connection that they chose, perhaps with a larger fixed amount offered to rural and remote practices who have to pay more for more for their connections than urban ones. If I had higher moral and ethical values like John Mackenzie (and I dips me lid to you, John), I would have not have accepted the government's thirty pieces of silver for my practice's Internet connection. Oliver Frank, general practitioner 255 North East Road, Hampstead Gardens South Australia 5086 Ph. 08 8261 1355 Fax 08 8266 5149 M 0407 181 683 _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
