Mario This occurs because different people have different configirations etc. Not every minute detail can be testyed unless one has dozens of testers etc. Some functions of my programs I might only use once a month, some weekly & some daily. If you look at what some users say about the same product: Some users find it bug free after an upgrade, others find it has new bugs. Why ? All depends on each system.
Even motor cars have recalls - and they cost far more than PC software. These problems were not found on initial testng of the car. Can you then say it is a crap car because there was a recall ? Cedric -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mario Ruiz Sent: Tuesday, 3 July 2007 8:41 PM To: General Practice Computing Group Talk Subject: Re: [GPCG_TALK] Wish list- Medical Software Marvelous?, Why would anyone code a "Downgrade" in an application? It speak tons of the Unit/Apps Testing process quality in the first place, and then leave it to the user to clean up the mess. Is that marvelous? Is one thing to roll-back data updates (ie rdbms), but a totally different thing to roll-back an application upgrade. if testing is not complete, one never releases the upgrade it in the first place. I'm not a purist but to me that really sucks. mario Cedric Meyerowitz wrote: > That is what happens to BP users too. Further in the unlikely event > that a program update has a bad bug that was missed, with a double > click we go back to the previous edition - thus no down time, trying > to uninstall the new program & then installing the old one, crossing > fingers etc. Marvelous. > > Cedric > > _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
