Who were using something else or who 'were not using something else'?? 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 17 July 2007 2:51 PM
To: General Practice Computing Group Talk
Subject: Re: [GPCG_TALK] MD 3.6 update (humour)

A new GP to town (another practice) said that his final decision as to which
practice to join came down to whether or not they used MD.   He said he
wouldn't
even look at practices who were not using something else.
  
Locums are becoming more fussy it seems.  (well I suppose they want their
notes to stay there for the future too)


felicity



>-- Original Message --
>From: Richard Terry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: General Practice Computing Group Talk <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: [GPCG_TALK] MD 3.6 update (humour)
>Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 09:58:55 +1000
>Reply-To: General Practice Computing Group Talk <[email protected]>
>
>
>Maybe slightly off topic, but I went and saw my own GP last week to get

>something fozen off. He uses MDW 2 and intending to upgrade to 3
>
>There was a new disease and some sort of request in my notes - not 
>belonging
>
>to me!!!! He commented on 'don't know how that got there -- dosn't 
>belong to you' and did look genuinely puzzled.
>
>I can recall previous debates on various lists about data accuracy with
MD
>2.
>
>Wonder if BP has ever caused any(yet)  as everyone seems enthusiastic 
>about
>
>it.
>
>Richard
>
>
>On Tuesday 17 July 2007 09:51, Dr John Van Dyck wrote:
>> One of the reasons I joined a group practice with practice manager 
>> (other than myself) to worry about it.
>> I have realised now why I was so "interested" in computing.    Had to
be
>to
>> do it all myself in the country.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Behalf Of Thinus van Rensburg
>> Sent: Tuesday, 17 July 2007 8:19 AM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; General Practice Computing Group Talk
>> Subject: Re: [GPCG_TALK] MD 3.6 update (humour)
>>
>> Andrew wrote:
>> > I'm actually loving this update.
>> >
>> > Things have been a bit quiet and this update gave me 6 hours work 
>> > in
>a
>> > tiny 3 GP practice.
>> >
>> > My thanks go to HCN for their unending support of techies in small 
>> > businesses all over Australia.
>> >
>> > Andrew.C
>>
>> Yes I love the ways that computers "save me time".
>>
>> Came in on my off Saturday and started at 12h00PM - did network 
>> maintenance and backups to make sure server and all six workstations 
>> were as efficient and clean of bugs as possible - too about 3 hours 
>> Then started 3.6 update
>-
>> took another 6 hours. Tried to fix the PKI error - no luck
>>
>> Then went home and tried to install 3.6 on home server where I 
>> restore backups - no luck - same error - gave up after 2 1/2 hours - 
>> sent e-mails to all who could help.
>>
>> Sunday morning I get advice from Peter M on how to fix PKI - back to 
>> work after church and only takes 30min to fix that issue and check.
>>
>> Monday Peter has to log in and fix our back-up system - HCN changed 
>> database names with the update and the scripts are broken. he spents ?
>> how many hours trying to fix the home machine but we then realise 
>> that
>my
>> harddrive needs to be uncompressed as the isntall does not work on a 
>> compressed drive.
>>
>> I get home about 9PM last night and do the uncompress - 3hours later 
>> I
>can
>> install the update.
>>
>> Restore system still does not work due to reasons that are way beyond
my
>IT
>> skills/knowledge so Peter M will fix that.
>>
>> So lets add up: I spent 12h on my off weekend and another two hours 
>> last night - all unpaid. In addition I will owe my It support several 
>> hours
>of
>> labour.
>>
>> So glad this computerised system saves time and money - NOT !!
>> T
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gpcg_talk mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gpcg_talk mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
>_______________________________________________
>Gpcg_talk mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to