certainly not a post mortem. just having a look at at the so called 'non hierarchical', 'progressive space '(very subjective) it is not as if i ve no problem with devika's stand (i do appreciate criticism whther it b from dilip or devika) since u have raised the "moral" question ,and both of u (devika and dilip) voice same views, i thought why should i waist 'cyber energy' by responding to all. my response to u could be equally applicable to devika as well. as i m new entrant i m not aware of her previous interventions (which could be (need not necessarily) equally 'problematic' from my 'problematic position, of course.
and it's not ideal commn i m seeking ..in fact der is none like that... politics of academic knowledge production, power enjoyed by intellectuals within certain domain...should be debated and i m not positioning myself with extereme self righteousness at all and also dont want to attribute it on any even if made nice 'interventions'... she'd have made interventions with her caste HIndu women's postion to problematise all MALE/MAIL "abuses" or is it like we ve to submit a memorandum to get a response? (antha kalam poymaranjenna adiyan karutiyathu!! ) or is this the politcs of academic knowledge production?!!!! (sorry if u consider it an abuse.) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Green Youth Movement" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
