Since this
On 7/10/08, S sanjeev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> i also find this irritating damodar.
> i still believe my *first response to subid/satchidanadan was clear and
> unambiguous*.
> thanx for the accusation,even though half hearted.
> hoping for a full blown one.
> bye.
> i* have a request.
> before you** lodge a complaint against those poor mullahs* *please* *read
> Ernst Kirchner Karel's doctoral dissertation **"Kerala Sound
> Electricals:Amplified Sound and Cultural Meaning in South India". (Chicago
> univ,2003)
> PS; i wish i too had a beautiful reply just like satchidanandan's with all
> those birds,trees and wonderful silences.*
The sameness of irritation I can understand.
But Since this is discussion group, I now request other group memebrs to
enbale me what Sanjeev actually meant. For me the possibilty was
speculation, speculate what Sanjeev ought to have said can be based on his
previous writings. {In that case, we emphasise the continuity and sameness
of self. No problems??}.
Or What else can we all sepculate? I am not addressing this to all and no
intnetion of any acusuation, full or half blown.
*I am limiting to this virtaul domain,Sanjeev *
damodar
--- On *Thu, 10/7/08, damodar prasad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>* wrote:
>
> From: damodar prasad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [GreenYouth] Re: sound pollution
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Green Youth Movement" <
> [email protected]>
> Date: Thursday, 10 July, 2008, 3:37 PM
>
> I will now respond to your first part bocz I found it irritating.
> Whatever anonymity we claim in this group, Sanjeev and Me knows closley and
> so I cant stop responding to this.
>
> the meanign of patronising:
>
> *patronising* - (used of behavior or attitude) characteristic of those who
> treat others with condescension - of or characteristic of high rank or
> importance; "a superior ruler"
>
> Do sanjeev consider my tone as patronising in the above meaning?
>
> when you say that a particular person's response was submerged in the
> layers of varied meanings, do you think it as patronising?
>
> Unfortunately, it was Satchi mash response. Unfortunately he is a
> cleberated poet by name Satcidanadan whom I may refer to as Satchi mash. Is
> that made you think I was 'patronising"? I doubt.
>
> But sanjeev pls. dont make such sweeping phrases to silence a point which I
> wanted to make. If in case you think trying to enable an argument put forth
> my another perons is patronising... Dileep's quotes are no less patronising?
> Then you may say that Satchi mash himself can represent him here. Ok,
> fine..thats well and good. But let that not deter me from quoting him and
> bring forth his reflections to present my view.
>
> I also like to accuse you here, even half-heartedly, that you have a
> condesceding attitude towards every one in this group as you impress to read
> academic texts and then ony come here for discussion.
>
> damodar
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 7/10/08, S sanjeev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> DAMODAR PRASAD WRITES : After reading the thread of this discussion, I
>> found the points raised by Satchi mash was sunk by a parochialistic
>> understading of religion in public space...I found Satchi Mash was enabling
>> a different pursuit of understanding, which was submerged in the
>> amplification of an altogether different concerns.
>>
>> Why this patronizing tone damodar prasad?
>>
>>
>> Secondly, Sudeep has clearly identified the location in his first posting,
>> i.e, Valanchery and it's a mail highlighting a personal issue.
>>
>>
>> Valanchery is in Malapuram dictrict which has it's own turbulent history
>> of formation, and i dont think the matter of one's location and
>> socio-cultural negotiations with it could be simply termed "personal".
>>
>> this is what subid says in his last mail : "If one doesn't react, all will
>> become deaf. And impotent."
>>
>> who is this virile subject, who is talking?
>>
>> regarding tradition,modernity, power and sound let me allow to provide one
>> more reading list;
>>
>> Michael Roberts, "NOISE AS CULTURAL STRUGGLE:TOMTOM BEATING, THE BRITISH
>> AND COMMUNAL DISTURBANCE IN SRILANKA,1880-1930", Veena Das (ed) Mirrors
>> of Violence,1990
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> T
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I found Satchi Mash was enabling a different pursuit of understanding,
>> which was submerged in the amplification of an altogether different
>> concerns.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> **
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> If one doesn't react, all will become deaf. And impotent.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> ------------------------------
>> Not happy with your email address?
>> Get the one you really want <http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/ymail/new.html> -
>> millions of new email addresses available now at
>> Yahoo!<http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/ymail/new.html>
>>
>
>
> >
>
> ------------------------------
> Not happy with your email address?
> Get the one you really want <http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/ymail/new.html> -
> millions of new email addresses available now at
> Yahoo!<http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/ymail/new.html>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
