hmmm.. there you made 'history' an object of discourse!! object: Again, relying on Murali's explication of object as a 'unity' taken in discourse analysis: "...we see the eruption into statement, of so many objects as discusrsive events. One might therefore list the discourses in terms of the objects that erupt into existence. ..The central problem about objects would be the proceses of their formation.this is a discriptive and not an explanatory exercise: generating the question 'how' and not 'why'.
( The Discursive Geography of upanishads, DCBooks, 2003,pp111-112) On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:02 AM, damodar prasad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > and may I add to it that History has no object. > > damodar > > > On 7/10/08, Dileep Raj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Writers like Banjamine, heidegger and Nietzsche still inspires me >>>> like Murali. *Thinking cannot be replaced with history of thinking.\* >>>> >>> >>> *Shall I order for a repeat? ---- single or twice* >>> >> >> >> :) (its a large version of simile!) >> >> May be out of fashion, but I go with Althusser: >> "Philosophy has no History" >> >>> ** >>> >>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Dileep R I thuravoor >>> >>> > -- Dileep R I thuravoor --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Green Youth Movement" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
