Elie Roux <[email protected]> writes: > I've seen another problem: to be as precise as possible, most pieces > come from several manuscripts (and maybe several books) so there should > be a possibility to indicate it. But I must admit I don't really know > how... maybe something like: > > manuscript[0].name = first title; > manuscript[0].piece-reference = reference; > > etc. would do the trick... what do you think?
hmmm. You mean, I assume, allowing multiple occurrences of the `manuscript' and closely related fields. On the whole that seems too much for the gabc header; I think the gabc header should be kept fairly simple. Classifying chant precisely and relating different sources is something which (I believe) chant scholars find hard work. (Certainly I get that impression from e.g. David Hiley's book.) I suspect that if such a scholar (and I'm not one) wanted to use gabc, they'd just put their own single reference in the header, and use a database or table, in a separate document, to show what they believe the relationships between different sources are. -- David Stone _______________________________________________ Gregorio-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-devel
