My one worry with using the standard GABC notation for beneventan neumes is there isn't a one-to-one mapping between note position and neume shape, the way there is with square notation, for example with the three notes of the Climacus, or the different shapes for a single note
A On 6/27/13 6:12 AM, Élie Roux wrote: > Dear Sister, > >> For me, there's a third answer: >> 3. I just need the beneventan neumes for special melodic passages where >> the square notation isn't properly returned. In this case the best for >> me should be having the possibility to add on a single place the >> reference line and neumes for the beneventan notation (Elie, see one of >> the pdf I sent you). > > Well, I not 100% sure I understand what you mean... Let me precise the > two answers I gave: > > 1. you need just the shape of the neume, with approximative height > > 2. you need the very precise height of the neume, as if it was on a score > > I think this is the main difference. I believe you would be in the first > case right? In the first case it's perfectly feasible to add a > beneventan neume only above a certain square neume... > >> Following what I wrote above: I think I'll never use Beneventan writing >> as an independent staff. > > Ok. Would someone use it? > > Thank you! -- _______________________________________________________ Aaron Macks([email protected]) [http://www.wiglaf.org/~aaronm ] My sheep has seven gall bladders, that makes me the King of the Universe! _______________________________________________ Gregorio-users mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-users
