Dear Elie, I'm not sure we understand each other completely... Let me put the two > possibilities another way (previous mails were not that clear): > > 1. all glyphs describing the same neume are the same, watever the height, > and we can shift them up and down. For example a clivis is a clivis, > whatever the ambitus. We can just shift it up or down to place it where it > looks the most like the manuscript. > > 2. all glyphs describing the same neume are not the same.F or example if > you have, in beneventan notation, something similar to a porrectus (I > remember seing something like this), with a big bar; then you should have > as many glyphs as there are ambitus for the notes (like in the current > Gregorio). For example the porrectus gfg won't be the same as the porrectus > geg. Will you (or Aaron?) use this? >
Ok, if I understood what you mean, I think that's the second possibility for me. Thank you! Thank you! Sr. Maria Ruth
_______________________________________________ Gregorio-users mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-users
