Hi Anthony, Please disregard my question on the MPLS scope, I originally responded based on revision number 2 of your draft. I just glanced through the current rev and it looks like you've addressed most of my comments.
David. On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 10:19 PM, David Swafford <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Anthony, > > > I just took my first read through and it appears to be quite polished > in the current state, but I do have a few comments to add: > > PMTUD -- It's good to see this specifically brought up. > > NAT -- I see you point for bringing this up and in my mind, I think > the largest pain point will be with regard to training of our junior > engineers when RFC1918 space is no longer "just the inside". It makes > sense that one might run into operational issues given that device > software was written within the context of RFC1918 being the internal > side of a NAT setup, or firewall policies for that matter. > > DNS -- this section seems to be a little wordy in my opinion, here's a > potential rewrite that comes to my mind: > > Many ISPs utilise their DNS to perform both forward and reverse > resolution for infrastructure addresses. Within a privately numbered > core, the ISP itself would still have the capability to perform name > resolution of their own infrastructure, however, others beyond the ISP > would not have this capability. > > MLPS VPN -- I'm curious to know your intended scope on this topic? > > Overall though, It looks to fill in a needed place of reference for > future discussion on the topic. > > > David. > > David Swafford, CCNP, CEH, CWSP > Senior Network Engineer, CareSource > > On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Anthony Kirkham <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> All, >> >> I'd appreciate any advice on how I might progress this draft. I'm reasonably >> happy with it now, but unsure how to take it the next step. I'd greatly >> appreciate any guidance. >> >> Document draft-kirkham-private-ip-sp-cores >> Revision 04 >> WG Individual Submission >> Document date 2011-06-16 >> Submission date 2011-06-16 >> Title Issues with Private IP Addressing in the Internet >> >> People in the past have indicated the draft is useful. I hope this is still >> the case, despite it taking a long while to get to this stage. >> >> Regards and thanks >> Tony K >> >> >> -- >> >> Anthony Kirkham >> Solution Architect >> >> World Wide Security >> Service Practice >> >> [email protected] >> Phone: +61 (0)7 3238 8203 >> Mobile: +61 (0)401 890 494 >> >> CISSP, CCIE# - 1378 >> >> Level 12, 300 Adelaide Street >> Brisbane, Qld, 4000 >> Australia >> Cisco home page >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> GROW mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow >> > _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
