On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > Sigh. I replied to an item in an mis-sorted grow mailbox without checking > the date. It looks like this was supported for WG adoption, but I still > don't see a matching draft-grow?
we missed the draft 00 deadline, so Tony I think is sending (or has sent?) one in anyway and it out to pop out the sausage manufacture when the floodgates open. > On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 04:37:15PM -0400, Jeffrey Haas wrote: >> Tony, >> >> Note, I'm not speaking for the chairs or the ADs. >> >> On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 10:48:10AM +1000, Anthony Kirkham wrote: >> > I'd appreciate any advice on how I might progress this draft. I'm >> > reasonably happy with it now, but unsure how to take it the next >> > step. I'd greatly appreciate any guidance. >> >> Two paths are: >> - Keep it as an individual submission and find an AD to sponsor the >> appropriate IESG review, etc: >> http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/ad-sponsoring-docs.html >> - Get the GROW chairs to do some of this work for you by requesting adoption >> of the draft as a GROW WG document. Glancing at the *very stale* charter, >> it's in scope for the WG. IMO, given the amount of comment the draft has >> received to date, perhaps it should even just go through WGLC. >> >> -- Jeff >> >> P.S. to the GROW chairs - it's probably time for a recharter. And I thought >> the BFD milestones were stale! :-) >> _______________________________________________ >> GROW mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow > _______________________________________________ > GROW mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
