Sigh. I replied to an item in an mis-sorted grow mailbox without checking the date. It looks like this was supported for WG adoption, but I still don't see a matching draft-grow?
-- Jeff On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 04:37:15PM -0400, Jeffrey Haas wrote: > Tony, > > Note, I'm not speaking for the chairs or the ADs. > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 10:48:10AM +1000, Anthony Kirkham wrote: > > I'd appreciate any advice on how I might progress this draft. I'm > > reasonably happy with it now, but unsure how to take it the next > > step. I'd greatly appreciate any guidance. > > Two paths are: > - Keep it as an individual submission and find an AD to sponsor the > appropriate IESG review, etc: > http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/ad-sponsoring-docs.html > - Get the GROW chairs to do some of this work for you by requesting adoption > of the draft as a GROW WG document. Glancing at the *very stale* charter, > it's in scope for the WG. IMO, given the amount of comment the draft has > received to date, perhaps it should even just go through WGLC. > > -- Jeff > > P.S. to the GROW chairs - it's probably time for a recharter. And I thought > the BFD milestones were stale! :-) > _______________________________________________ > GROW mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
