Jon
The Caddy you're referring to was the 4-6-8, a V8 with an electrically
actuated MECHANICAL device which allowed or prevented actuation of some
intake valves.  The electronic system I was referring to is essentially
a solenoid on each valve, i.e. no cam or rockers or pushrods.  It's my
understanding that some of the grand prix cars use this now.  Talking to
a Ford guy at an engineering show ~1990 he said that solenoids "used too
much power" so there was no net gain.  I thanked the guy and went
elsewhere 'cause I know fertilizer when I hear it.

There is also a "variable valve timing system" which consists of
hydraulic lifters with a calibrated leak.  Low RPM the oil bleeds out &
you get reduced lift, high RPM less oil bleeds out and you get more
lift.  Wear is an obvious problem, along with noise and mushrooming the
valve stems.

Bill

-----Original Message-----
From: GTS-1000 Owners List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Of Crisler, Jon
Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 10:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Airbox mods

Actually, different length/diameter intake runners are fairly common now
in cars, sometimes with valves that shut down one intake at low speeds.
I have tuned runners in my lowly Ford Contour with the V6, which is
actually a quite spunky littlecar.

 As for electronic valve actuation, a form of this design actually made
it into a production Cadillac sometime in the 80's, known as the V4-6-8.
At low power, only 4 cylinders had the intakes operating.  Obviously,
something was flawed in the design, as I think it lasted 2-3 years and
they dropped it.

-----Original Message-----
From: wghalley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 11:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Airbox mods


Nick
Less air flow at low RPM due to airbox restriction won't make more
torque.  The way to make more torque at low RPM is to increase the air
velocity, which requires smaller intake manifold, ports and valves, all
of which restrict airflow at high RPM and hurt top end power.
Essentially you get a ram air effect tuned for low RPM.

Restricting the airbox is the same as putting an orifice plate in the
intake.  This will give you a pressure drop due to the decrease in air
flow.  This will decrease the charge pressure in the cylinder (because
there's less of it) which has about the same effect as reducing the
compression.

What you can do is have two different size intake runners & valves, a
small one and a big one.  They work like the old spread bore 4 barrel
carbs - small primary and huge secondary.  This is part of the Caddy
Northstar design.  If you could combine this with variable valve timing
you'd have what you want.  Best hope is electronic valve actuation -
which is being studied (for the last 15 years) but hasn't made it into
production.

Bill



-----Original Message-----
From: GTS-1000 Owners List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Of nicholas.threader
Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2002 5:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Airbox mods

Hi all ,
Has anyone altered their standard airbox to flow slightly more air ,
i've
used S&B filters for some time but they seem to flow a bit too much air
in
low to mid-range , so i've switched back to the standard box , now my
bike
feels like it could do with a bit more air from mid-range up . Maybe a
tuneable airbox ? less flow at low rev's to give torque and more flow at
high rev's to give power , am i barking up the right tree with my way of
thinking ?
I'm looking at altering the 2 rubber intakes that are stuck on the sides
of
the airbox .

atb Nick T
Happy Christmas to one and all .


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.431 / Virus Database: 242 - Release Date: 17/12/2002

The information contained in this e-mail including any attachments may
constitute Corvis Corporation Proprietary Information that is subject to
Non-Disclosure Agreement and cannot be disclosed to any other party
without the express consent of  Corvis Corporation.  If you are neither
the intended recipient of this e-mail nor responsible for delivering
this e-mail to the intended recipient, note that any dissemination,
distribution, copying, or retention of this e-mail is prohibited.  If
you believe you have received this e-mail in error, we request that you
notify the sender by return e-mail and then delete this e-mail  and any
return e-mail immediately.

Reply via email to