> More questions:
> 
> * Mule, Horse or Elephant, that is how much payload and is
>   it capable of carrying people? The classic Jeep is called
>   a quarter-ton truck, and it can carry four ...

I pitched it as an outsize quad cyberbike, able to carry a very good load.  
Or a chevaline [robot horse].

He wanted me to go with a jeep and I said a Mule and we went at it via the
Firefly interpretation - then I showed him the MULE on Future Weapons and he
was sold.

He said it had to be a 'horse', so the cargo arm and the periscope.  I
argued against a gunmount as that seemed to be too optimised. 

Also I wanted the Mule at about 75% optimal capability

I 'sketched' the Mule as an ATV/quadbike on PCP:

A bulky body covered with battered and flakily painted hull with some
original and some after-production access panels - some welded shut.
Skeletonised pipe framed cargo brackets sit over the front limb/wheel mounts
and the back half of the body.  A 'drivers' seat sits over the front third
of the body - other fold out seats hang on either side - this seat has big
footrests, cup holders and an umbrella bracket.  A cooler is attached to the
side of it and wired into the body.
The framework is battered, chipped and wrapped in tape and cord, with the
platform sections made of different materials from metal wire grids, thru
leather and cloth and so-on.  Boxes of laminate shamboo, dense resin and
structural alloy are tied, bungeed and statglued to the frame; they are
travel stained and cosmetically damaged.  A metallic box has stripy
carbon-scarring like its been flailed with DEW fire.
The robot arm judders thru the start movements.  Its three parts are from
three different models and the fingers of the hand are mismatched and tend
to make it look like the bot is giving you the finger.
If wheeled:
The wheel hubs don’t match, they are different types, colours and conditions
and a new wrapped wire spare sits over the headlamps.
If legged:
The back legs are from a larger model of walker, reset to balance evenly -
they make the mule look somewhat like a giant rabbit.  The footings are
turned alloy with steel rivets like giant hobnail boots.

All colour, but I think they allow for some flaws that have come from
ill-use, age and half-assed repair.

...I wonder if I can get the GM to agree to a Frankenstein AI?  Age, repair
kludges and associated affection from users have socialised it sufficiently
to allow it to go beyond programming...  
...or is that as screamingly cliché as I think it is?


> * Can it listen and speak? Technically, synthesizing speech
>   is a lot easier than analyzing it, but a "mule" which can
>   listen but not talk is closer to the stereotype - think
>   R2D2.

I don’t think it is supposed to talk - but that may be in development...

_______________________________________________
GurpsNet-L mailing list <[email protected]>
http://mail.sjgames.com/mailman/listinfo/gurpsnet-l

Reply via email to