On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Roger Burton West <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:54:14PM +0200, Johannes Trimmel wrote: > >>I can imagine liquids or powdery or grain like substances, that are >>damaged due to rough handling. But then you will damage your goods if >>you freight handle them in wetbulk or drybulk fashion. If you use >>handling appropriate for fragile cargo, it would no longer be >>classified as wetbulk or drybulk. > > Perhaps it can take the stresses of normal bulk handling, but not (e.g.) > sudden impacts?
Normal bulk handling includes lots of sudden impacts. I would take 'fragile' to mean environmentally fragile, requiring precise conditions or you ruin the chemical structure of your cargo or somesuch. I say this knowing nothing about Far Trader's classifications, though. ~Celti _______________________________________________ GurpsNet-L mailing list <[email protected]> http://mail.sjgames.com/mailman/listinfo/gurpsnet-l
