Hi Onno,
Not a problem. :)
Thought I'd send this link regards to stats on the cannons in case you're
interested.
Hal
http://www.houseoftheorangemonkey.co.uk/monkey/trips/trip1461615.htm
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Onno Meyer
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 11:53 AM
To: The GURPSnet mailing list
Subject: Re: [gurps] Wooden Ships and Iron Frames
Hello Hal,
thanks for you mails, but keep in mind that I'm increasingly departing from
history in my designs.
The steam sloop is pretty close to history, cf HMS Gorgon (1837), except
that I'm suggesting in the text that she could have come earlier. The rules
don't discriminate between 1800 and 1840 steam engines, they're all "early
steam".
The steam ship of the line is actually smaller than the first screw
battleships, being based on an 1800s third rate instead of an 1830s first
rate. Again my color text points out that the steam engine is "plain
vanilla" TL5 and available as of 1800; of course the screws are listed as
late TL5.
The next one is based on a historical design which was never launched, and
the one after that will go completely off the rails if she works out as
planned.
> Hi Onno,
> Sorry for the delay in responding to this. If you'd like, I'll dig
> up the reference I have regarding English warships that determined the
> width of the gunports for the various guns in question.
Right now I'm wondering how to GURPSify a pivot mount on the deck of a ship.
One idea was to place a carriage-mounted weapon in an open mount.
VE102: A carriage mount is not required after early TL5. Does that mean it
is still allowed?
VE12: A carriage-mounted weapon must be mounted "concealed within the
vehicle", which increases the volume, but the same applies to ranged weapons
in a highly streamlined vehicle -- obviously the concealed mount is not
restricted to gun ports in the hull, but it sounds weird to conceal
something in an open mount.
The other idea was to assume that proper pivot mounts are a mid-TL5
development, and to GURPSify them as a muzzleloader without carriage mount
(which is not required any more, see above), mounted in an open mount. That
saves half the weight and even more volume, but it might not be justice to
the recoil mechanism.
> If you are
> ever in the mood to pick up a book on the HMS VICTORY, this one I
> picked up from Amazon.com recently for a decent price. You'll find
> some interesting information worth looking into.
>
> http://www.haynes.co.uk/Press/Releases_contents/120402_HMSVictory.pdf
I've got the Osprey book on the British Napoleonic Ship-of-the-Line, Brown's
Warrior to Dreadnought, and Conway's Steam, Steel and Shellfire.
I'm thinking about Brown's Before the Ironclad, but the reprint is 39 EUR on
amazon.de. Too much for an impulse buy.
I have a Haynes on the Millenium Falcon and was not very impressed by that
-- it feels written for a younger audience. Are the historical ones better?
> In any event, subsequent research on gunnery in that era makes me
> believe that GURPS should have gone a different route when determining
> how much damage is done by a cannon ball :(
4E has some problems, especially with the scaling of HP, but also the chance
to do some other things better. I wait for a new vehicle design book.
The old Vehicles 1st had (!) notation for low-velocity roundshot, not to be
confused with the (!) for Traveller meson guns. They allow low penetration
with high raw damage.
Regards,
Onno
_______________________________________________
GurpsNet-L mailing list <[email protected]>
http://mail.sjgames.com/mailman/listinfo/gurpsnet-l
_______________________________________________
GurpsNet-L mailing list <[email protected]>
http://mail.sjgames.com/mailman/listinfo/gurpsnet-l
