WHAT IF YOU CONSISTANTLY RUN INTO A PROBLEM ON MACHINE AFTER MACHINE THAT REQUIRES A SUPPORT CALL, AND THE OWNERS OF THE MACHINES EXPECT THE END RESELLER TO MAKE THE SUPPORT CALL FOR THEM AND GET THE PROBLEM RESOLVED? THE SUPPORT PERSON CAN RESOLVE THIS VERY WELL KNOWN PROBLEM ABOUT 95% OF THE TIME AND THE OTHER 5% IT'S INSOLUABLE. SUPPOSE THERE IS A ONE SIZE FITS ALL SOLUTION, IE GET RID OF THE REDUNDANT TECHNOLOGY THAT IS CAUSING THE PROBLEM IN THE FIRST PLACE, BUT THE PRODUCER REFUSES TO DO THIS IN THE FACE OF TREMENDOUS LOSSES TO RESELLERS AND LARGE SUPPORT COST TO THE COMPANY ITSELF?

IS THE SUPPORT GOOD THEN BECAUSE THE SERVICE IS ALMOST INVARIABLY FRIENDLY AND BECAUSE %95 OF THE TIME THE PROBLEM CAN BE RESOLVED WITH THE HELP OF THE COMPANY SUPPORT REP? OR WOULD THE SUPPORT BE BETTER IF THE COMPANY WOULD SIMPLY LET GO OF THE REDUNDANT TECHNOLOGY? THAT IS THE SITUATION SURROUNDING THE FREEDOM SCIENTIFIC ILM LICENCING SCHEME AND DONGLE AUTHORIZATION SYSTEM.

IT'S RATHER A GUTTING SITUATION FOR THE SUPPORT GUY MEDIATING BETWEEN THE END USER AND THE PRODUCER. WE TAKE THE BRUNT OF THE CLIENT'S RATH AND WASTE THE RESELLER'S TIME AND MONEY, AND THEN WE HAVE TO TURN AROUND AND BE AS NICE AS POSSIBLE TO THE COMPANY SUPPORT REP, BECAUSE WELL DANG IT, IT'S NOT THEIR FAULT AFTER ALL.

BEST,

erik burggraaf
A+ sertified technician and user support consultant.
Phone: 888-255-5194
Email: [email protected]

On 25-Jul-09, at 5:24 PM, Mike Pietruk wrote:

Tony makes a good point here. One's reaction to support, be it positive, negative, or neutral, will be based on one's experiences, the luck of the draw on who happens to field the calls, and whether they were successful
in solving a situation.
If the solution is a straightforward simple one, and the problem relative familiar to the support person, the support will be viewed as excellent in
the eye of the beholder.
If, on the other hand, a particular incident is a stump to the support
person due to its uniqueness of a situation, and that support person
cannot solve it, then the customer view may not be so rosy.

The new trend in support is directly accessing the pc remotely and
allowing tech support to get a hands-on view of the problem and work on it. If either screen vendor takes this approach, this may be the wave of the future and will tell us who knows their stuff in fixing things rather
than the current system of a user describing a problem as he seees it,
then the tech trying to make sense of it, giving instructions to a user
who hopefully may be able to follow and implement them.

We had a Dell Tech recently work on our laptop and it was wonderful seeing how much they could do in a short period of time frustrating neither us
nor them.

Dealing with tech support is difficult for all parties.





Prayer is not so much about getting what we want, but discovering what God wants for us.

Bryant Wright
Right From the Heart: Spreading Christ through radio, tv, and the web
http://www.rightfromtheheart.org/

If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original
sender only.  If your reply would benefit others on the list and
your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending
your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it.

All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, and can be searched through and sorted using the search
form at the bottom of the page.

If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
[email protected] and include leave gw-info in the body
of the message.


If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original
sender only.  If your reply would benefit others on the list and
your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending
your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it.

All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, and can be 
searched through and sorted using the search
form at the bottom of the page.
If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
[email protected] and include leave gw-info in the body of the message.

Reply via email to