Well, I sure don't know everything.

I'll be the first to admit that.

I'm in school everyday in one way or another.



At 08:30 PM 7/31/2009, you wrote:
The point best made here is that anybody who trys to show off as though they know everything there is to know about any computer just proved how little he knows. In today's world that isn't possible. so, anybody who tries to make that claim or put up that impression needs only to be told to "get a life". Of course, it is usually the programmer types who know little more about a computer than how to program in a language or two that want the world to believe that they know it all. But, I have some of the dumbest statements about computers from programmers.



----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Belle" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 11:02 PM
Subject: Re: Window eyes and 64bit systems


Right back at ya dude, you don't know crap about the applications I use, 64 bit does matter when you need to load big sample libraries and have access to more than 4 gb of memory.

My main program has been 64 bit for several years now, and no not a programmer, but I read white papers, and do a lot of study and reading, I came up in the command line days, and I install windows on my own systems and do my own teching, so I'm not stupid about computers.

I've restored and resurrected many machines, and any particulars I don't know I can find out about.

I'll go look up that term you mentioned, but in general, if I had to guess, it probably has to do with the fact that most 32 bit programs don't use more than 2 gigs of memory effectively anyway, and even xp doesn't address the full 4 gigs of memory in the same way in a 32 bit environment.

That's why I didn't bother putting 4 gigs in this machine.

I also know that until all the 64 bit apps grow up, my third party vst plug-ins, etc, that if we have a hybrid situation, then we won't realize the full benefits of 64 bit.

Remember in windows 95 and 98 when things that ran well under windows 3.1 actually ran slower?

Translation going on, I understand about that.

But some things are mature and happening now, like these 64 bit machines that are running daw software and are able to load huge sample libraries in to memory for
quick access.

I have technician friends who are running 64 bit systems mac folks, and vista 64 folks, and they keep me posted about stuff.

It's we in the blind community who are lagging behind and sucking hind tit so to speak.

So you couldn't put a track together and produce an album so who's stupid now?

We all have different gifts, and I know enough about computing to do my craft and also make a few bucks here and there fixing up people's computers when they bring them to me.

So any term I need to know
ahci mode, efi,
it doesn't matter, I can and do go study about it and learn.

So you threw a term at me I wasn't readily familiar with, big deal, I work with technology every day you'd have no idea which end was up.

I'm very proud of the independance and freedom I've gained from working with these machines, I use legacy hard-ware and software to help me tech even on newer machines, and your the worst jerk for trying to make me look stupid because there's no shame in being ignorant, only in remaining ignorant and I'm smart enough to go find out and I'm very intuitive, I've make calls on problems with systems techs have worked on for hours, and I'd say, hey, change out the video card and see what happens, and how about it, things work right?

So sometimes with this stuff, it's common sense, and seeing the big picture.

I've seen so many programmers who couldn't understand anything unless it was laid out in a logic sequence.

But some times problems are solved by thinking outside the box, and doing something different.


At 10:31 PM 7/30/2009, you wrote:
Well, I have read your two posts and your words make your lips sound like a flapping flat tire. Not sure what your expertise is but one thing I know is that you do not have any more of an investment in GW Micro than anyone else on this list so why do you think you are so special as to feel an entitlement. The software business is not an easy one and I feel you and a few others on this list have no idea of how difficult things can be in this bad economic time. And to your point about 32 bit verses 64 bit and what GW micro did or didn't do. Gw Micro realized that many of its users didn't have, and probably wouldn't have, 64 hardware when they had to make a decision about which way to go. They also realize like many other software vendors, that you can't just break the whole user base that you have built. Even Microsoft had to make the same decision when they decided to release Vista. And, just in case you don't know, and I would bet you don't, even Sun Microsystems did not have 64 bit Java when We was released. It has only been abailble for a couple of months. And, for your assertion that 64 bit software runs so much faster than 32 bit software, I can tell you that the machine on which i am writing is a 32 bit machine and my brother-in-law has one almost exactly like this one but with the 64 bit OS and 4 verses 2 GB, and I can tel you that you can't tell the difference for most applications. Most applications that you run are probably not compute bound. I worked in the computer business for over 32 years and I would bet you again that you have no idea of what a compute bound program is and I can further tell you without knowing anything else about your blow away system that there is nothing on it or even my system that is a compute bound application. So, I would suggest that you change that flapping tire and if you don't understand me, I'l be more clear, button your lip unless you know what you are talking about.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Belle" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 9:10 PM
Subject: Re: Window eyes and 64bit systems


Whoops, got a cheer-leader mad, sorry.

Nope, not a programmer, never said I was, what I meant to say was that porting from xp to 32 bit vista was easier than porting to 64 bit so that's why gwmicro decided to do the easy code instead of tackling 64 bit, you know the immediate gratification thing.

But the easy path isn't always the best one because 64 bit is gonna be a much bigger player than 32 bit vista or windows 7 and we're seeing that now.

I just looked at what I wrote, and I can maybe see why you might have gotten that confused, but taking things in context and what I wrote afterwords, it seems pretty clear to me what I was saying.

Maybe that's a limitation of the programming mind 'grin'.

But no offense intended, all the cheer-leaders can sit down, and if it weren't for people like me pushing the envelope, and expecting the highest for our hard-earned money, these guys would get fat and lazy and really get behind.

I have to keep up to be competitive in my field of expertise, so I expect the best tools for the job.

As long as I've got money invested in gwmicro, I have a right to expect the best, just as my clients I do work for have the right to expect the best from me and believe me, they do, they keep me on my toes.

So, my email was a compliment to the company in fact,
maybe not a cheer-leader style, because the way it goes on these lists is that you tote the party line and don't say anything bad and then appologize when you do ask for something or mention something that needs to be done, or that should have been done.

I won't do that, I tell it like it is.

I'll do it respectfully, and some times I might pull a chain or be a little cheeky, but that's just how I am, people that don't like my posts can hit the delete key 'grin'.

I know this is hard work but if your going to be the best and say your the best, then deliver the best.

It doesn't matter now, we've got 64 bit.

I just think in retrospect that gwmicro would have served themselves better if 64 bit had been a priority earlier rather than 32 bit vista.

But yes, I do indeed understand that that would have been the harder thing to do.

Regards.




        At 07:01 PM 7/30/2009, you wrote:
A small task to port a screen reader from 32 bit to 64 bit? Hmmm, Chris, what programming expertise do you have to warrant such a statement?

----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Belle" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 4:53 PM
Subject: Re: Window eyes and 64bit systems


Actually, our guys came through and weren't lagging too far behind the competition on this one, makes me proud.

We indeed have 64 bit.

I mentioned to the fine folks about some time ago, or some such when vista 32 had just come out and that was probably the easy code to do.

I said 64 bit was gonna be the big thing, and they were starting to become more and more on systems even then.

I got spanked for mentioning such a thing 'grin',
because gw were patting themselves on the back for vista 32 release,

but serious attention could and should have been implemented then because some of us could see which way the pig was running.

And sure enough, 64 bit is taking over now and how nice if we'd been first because vista 32 isn't that big a deal and I believe in my heart that 64 bit flavor of vista, and most likely 64 bit windows 7 will be the winner like xp is.

Vista 32 was a big flop in the industry and everybody knows it.

Hmmm, let's see 4 gig architectural limit, but more over-head for the os equals less memory for the programs, equals doggy performance.

So atleast now because I don't have a 64 bit version of jaws, if I want to slap 64 bit sonar on this fine dual core machine and not cripple it with a 32 bit os, and really get in to high gear, even with no scripts and such, I might have some chance at access because all the versions of sonar since version 5 will do 64 bit.

So thanks guys for not making me wait too long 'grin'.




At 05:32 PM 7/30/2009, you wrote:
Hi,

Does WE support 64 bit OS yet?  I'm asking because I placed a order on
Monday for a new desktop system from Dell and I just found out that it's a 64 bit system. I really hope it is one because I haven't been around in a
while.

Otis

If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original
sender only.  If your reply would benefit others on the list and
your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending
your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it.

All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, and can be searched through and sorted using the search
form at the bottom of the page.

If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
[email protected] and include leave gw-info in the body
of the message.

If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original
sender only.  If your reply would benefit others on the list and
your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending
your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it.

All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, and can be searched through and sorted using the search
form at the bottom of the page.
If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
[email protected] and include leave gw-info in the body of the message.



__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4292 (20090730) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com


__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4292 (20090730) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com



If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original
sender only.  If your reply would benefit others on the list and
your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending
your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it.

All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, and can be searched through and sorted using the search
form at the bottom of the page.
If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
[email protected] and include leave gw-info in the body of the message.

If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original
sender only.  If your reply would benefit others on the list and
your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending
your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it.

All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, and can be searched through and sorted using the search
form at the bottom of the page.
If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
[email protected] and include leave gw-info in the body of the message.

If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original
sender only.  If your reply would benefit others on the list and
your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending
your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it.

All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, and can be searched through and sorted using the search
form at the bottom of the page.
If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
[email protected] and include leave gw-info in the body of the message.

If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original
sender only.  If your reply would benefit others on the list and
your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending
your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it.

All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, and can be searched through and sorted using the search
form at the bottom of the page.
If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
[email protected] and include leave gw-info in the body of the message.

If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original
sender only.  If your reply would benefit others on the list and
your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending
your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it.

All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, and can be searched through and sorted using the search
form at the bottom of the page.
If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
[email protected] and include leave gw-info in the body of the message.

If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original
sender only.  If your reply would benefit others on the list and
your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending
your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it.

All GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo, and can be 
searched through and sorted using the search
form at the bottom of the page.
If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
[email protected] and include leave gw-info in the body of the message.

Reply via email to