Shane, gwmicro is in business to make money.

YOu don't really expect them to shoot themselves in the foot right?

I won't tell someone to go down the road and record music because they get better service down town 'grin', the name of the game is to do it better, do it cheaper, and be first.

So if uncle bill comes out with a hot-dog screen-reader,
companies llike gw and others will have to shag ass and step up the pace and offer something else to help enhance, or specialize, just like they said, in the rest of the stuff they said, I really .liked the statements they made for the most part, and applaud them as being the only company to show up, at a boy guys,
I'm proud of ya, but that particular statement made me laugh out loud,
but it's hard to be diplomatic about something like that.

Of course we don't want any heavy duty competition,
because we won't get paid as much anymore.

and we'll have to work harder.

That's what it should have said.

But you know how this stuff is,
you have to sling stunning bullshit around, and impress people.

But yeh, having another screen-reader choice being a dis-service to blind people is like taking fish off the buffett on friday when you know a bunch of catholics are comming in on the bus for lunch 'grin'.

I'm still grinning over that one.

What big round furry balls to say something like that.

heheheheheahhahahahahhe

If I ever see Doug, or who ever said that anywhere, I'll slap him on the back and buy him a beer, nice try, but we're not that stupid.

Some of us aren't anyway.



At 05:01 PM 9/1/2010, shane findley wrote:
"GW Micro believes that having a free screen reader as part of the operating system does a disservice to Blind computer users."

I thought this to be a hypocritical viewpoint.  Somewhat charlatanistic.
It is highly prejudicial to exclude low income users, or encourage an over priced payment plan like some sort of layaway. The price is highly debatable. It's seems to have to many zeroes.
I think it's a typo, but no one seems to see it. (pun intended)
The program itself is not even practical, nor signifigantly better than the windows narrotor for common use.

Perhaps I should write the Obama administration to see what he thinks about GW micros position on affordable pricing of screen readers for the blind/disabled. If the president tested Window Eyes head to head with "real" software for the blind, he would have to "keep it real" and tell you exactly as I have. If not then we have a conspiracy on our hands, where the blind are being held back on purpose for extra profits. Or possibly for backdoor code abilities that rely on accessibility to mask their true intent.
I will not allow exploitation of the blind, in any case.

Window Eyes could be much better within a couple months of work.
I mean several times better than it is right now. I know this for a fact because I am a developer that has done it. I'd crumple WE, and throw it in the trash if I were blind. GW probably knows it too, but keeps it secret from the users, because they just don't want to spend the time required to fully wrap their heads arround it. Or they can't, yet still want to enjoy the positive cash flow. The price shows the greed, not crafsmanship.





If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it.

GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can manage your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.




        WARNING!!!

This email could contain innocent phrases which, if taken out of context, or read from an existing inclination to be hostile, or an overly politically correct world view could induce cursing, abusive language, or other indications of less than desirable behavior in a public venue.
No ill will is intended.
The sender takes no responsibility for mis-interpretation or otherwise extrapolated extended meaning, intent, or purposes implied or imagined from said phrases. The receiver of any such email containing such phrases is solely responsible for good interpretation and intelligent deployment of subsequent responses to the above communication.
If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only. 
If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to 
GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so 
the entire list will receive it.

GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can manage 
your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.

Reply via email to