On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Vaughan Dodd wrote: > I guess I am left wondering - not having done the survey and not intending to > - is this organisation (WebAIM.org), funded by a particular screen reader > developer?
No. We are a web accessibility advocacy and consulting group. Our mission is to make the online lives of people with disabilities better. We invite you to check out our resources and tools at webaim.org. We collect screen reader survey data to better inform the web accessibility development community on user preferences, technologies, etc. We invite you to complete the survey. Your responses are very valuable to us and the development community. > Certainly: if there is a glaring weakness with Window-eyes, GW need to fix > it, but they don't need a potentially vested interest in another company to > use its list to trash them. I don't think I have been "trashing" Window-Eyes. As I have done several times in the past, I'm simply trying to document the issue and inform users that if they encounter issues with standards-compliant checkbox and radio button groups, that the issue is likely with Window-Eyes and that they will need to enter Browse mode to find the relevant descriptions. It seems updates to Browse mode may be coming in the future, so hopefully it will be addressed with these updates. Jared If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it. GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can manage your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.
