Well, if you are not running programs that have been developed to work with 
Office via Office and .net integration, you don't need VSTO runtime 3.0.  You 
do need it however, if it was a component of the accounting program you're 
using, which it sounds like it is if you say that Office 2010 is required for 
it, so I'd recommend you leave it.  VSTO runtime is there to support office 
integration with .net; in some scenarios, there are programs that plug into 
office that are written in .net, and so your accounting software just might 
have a component like that.  And if you are running office 2010, then you do 
not need office 2000.  And anything that is prefixed with "HP" can probably go 
too since most of them are OEM-based applications that can perform the same 
functions as most windows utilities, but they are normally inaccessible clones 
of these utilities, and then if you find that something doesn't work after 
uninstalling one of these, it is always there on HP's site for you to put back 
in; I've had to do that numerous times after accidentally removing what I 
thought was bloatware that actually wasn't.  But in terms of buying a new 
computer, my advice is still to do it over the phone that way you do not get 
useless crap that you do not want; HP should honor your customization requests 
if you go the customization route.  And another way to go is to buy their 
business-focused computers (normal users can purchase them regardless of their 
branding), and that way you are more likely to have more customization rights.  
So that's something to think about.

-----Original Message-----
From: Shannon [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 2:23 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: How to determine bloat ware? was: Thoughts on Window-eyes Stability

Katherine ,
Well I wasn't blaming the screen reader but... I bought a new computer because 
of all the problems I was having running Computer Ease (accounting program), 
and office 2010 on an xp machine with WE 8.0. I was told that possibly that my 
system was just not big enough to run all three programs at the same time. So I 
got a bigger faster one.
The problems didn't go away. I was blaming the computer but... I didn't have 
nearly the problems I am having with 7.5.4 on xp with the accounting program 
and Office 2000.  I have to use the Office suite 2010 to work with the 
accounting program. The  two of them connect. I am suspecting everything of 
interfering with my screen reader. That is why I am targeting non necessary 
programs and add-ins. Even one of the first things GW says is to turn off GW 
apps and start them one at a time to see if one of the Add-ons of GW is causing 
the problem. So I don't think it is too far to think that someone else's extra 
stuff might be tossing GW and WE a curve ball.

I already have the computer and don't have the opportunity to tell HP not to 
install some of its stuff. So now I have to find out what is a "Real"
program or just that fluffy stuff. If I am not using it or will ever use it 
then it can go. I am smart enough to know that I don't have to have the games 
package but what about that, "visual studio tools for the office system 3.0 run 
time"? I have no idea what that is or what it does and if it is part of MS 
Office and is needed to make a part of the program work.

This thing hasn't behaved as it was supposed to from day one.
Now is that because the operator "ME" has never used windows seven or is not 
too good with office 2010 or is  There an issue on this particular machine with 
conflicting programs? I don't know.
I have to have WE to play this game so I am leaning on the computer being 
wrong... but it is entirely possible that the screen reader has a problem given 
the feedback on this list.
I can look at the things that the WE manual says that should be happening in 
Outlook and then try it in my case and the behavior is not as advertised. So 
which one is the culprit?? The manual says one thing and reality is different. 
So is Outlook goofed or is WE?

Again back to the Outlook Add-ins and maybe the same is happening in Word too? 
I don't know.
Respectfully
Shannon


-----Original Message-----
From: Katherine Moss [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 12:42 PM
To: [email protected]; 'Vaughan Dodd'
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: How to determine bloat ware? was: Thoughts on Window-eyes Stability

You have to know each and every program on your machine and what it does if you 
want to do that.  You have to become more technical if you want to be accurate 
about it.  Your best bet is to look up everything that you see under add remove 
programs in the control panel and find a site that will tell you what they do.  
But your best avoidance of bloatware is to customize your machine at order time 
like Dell does; you can select no Antivirus, no extra junk, and no all that if 
you want.  But you have to take the time to do it; don't just go for the cheap 
stuff or else you won't get the chance to customize and you will be locked into 
certain things for at least a year or more.  So for instance, if buying a Dell, 
and you don't want their stupid antivirus trial subscription instead choosing 
to use your preferred application, either order your computer by phone and tell 
them specifically what you want and don't want or use the site, then they will 
honor that.
So, you avoid bloatware by not having the company install it in the first 
place.  Talk to the company and discuss what you want and don't want, and then 
you will be fine.  And this also sounds like a case of "blame the screen reader 
for all your problems".

-----Original Message-----
From: Shannon [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 10:54 AM
To: 'Vaughan Dodd'
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: How to determine bloat ware? was: Thoughts on Window-eyes Stability

Vaughan and all,

I am having many of the same issues and complaints with this release of WE on 
my new windows 7 64 b machine.

I would love to investigate the solution of removing the "Bloat ware" from this 
machine. However, I don't know what is and what is not bloat ware.
How do you tell what is and what is not important to the functioning of your 
machine?
Thanks.
I am also in the process of learning how to get rid of ADD-ins that I don't 
need as well. I keep getting the message that Outlook is not responding and
frequently       get a message that Outlook failed to start the last time.
Would I like to open it in safe mode? Some functionality will be lost in this 
mode but it will allow you to trouble shoot the problem.

A few google searches on this topic have indicated that there may be add ins 
that are causing the problem. I also don't know which of these add-ins are 
necessary to the functioning of the program.

If anyone has any ideas of how to determine which programs and or add ins are  
important I would love to learn about them.
Thanks
Shannon

-----Original Message-----
From: Vaughan Dodd [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 4:29 PM
To: 'Tony C'; '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: Thoughts on Window-eyes Stability

I can certainly testify to the success of removing manufacturer's junk from the 
Windows install, and Window-eyes apps like the infamous insert key definitely 
find the virtual rubbish bin,  but I think it unfortunate and a statement about 
poor quality control if Window-eyes apps, particularly those endorsed by GW 
Micro, are flaky.  In defence of Window-Eyes apps however:
the fact that those which are not wanted can be removed is a very useful 
feature; assuming that the install should put them in by default is also 
probably a good thing.

Vaughan.



-----Original Message-----
From: Tony C [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, 10 April 2013 12:30 a.m.
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Thoughts on Window-eyes Stability

Hi,
Since I've made sure not to have any unnecessary aps running or add-ons in IE I 
seldom ever have a crash. I haven't changed to IE 10 yet because we all know 
that Microsoft releases stuff before the buggs are worked out. They save a lot 
on Beta testers by doing this and letting the End Users do the Beta 
testing.<Grin>. Also, If you have things such as Del "help" and other priority 
software in you PC a lot of times they cause issues with any screen reader. I 
removed all the Del programs from my programs list and it greatly improved the 
performance.
Tony


-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Bahr
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 11:32 PM
To: gw-info
Subject: Re: Thoughts on Window-eyes Stability

I guess I don't quite get that feeling. They're doing all the things they can 
and...I really don't have a lot of stability problems here. I am running
8 gb of ram on one laptop and 16 gb on another. I still have issues but not a 
lot of crashes, famous last words. I guess it's a matter of the software I use, 
and the kill win-eyes app is a very useful one if we does crash. re:
error reports and information from gw, well, it's a small company.

I'm not saying these things to fully defend gw, every software company has 
their issues, this has just been my personal experience. I just tend to try one 
solution at a time and think of where the problem might be, where's the glitch. 
It's a puzzle.

just my thoughts,
dave
On 4/8/2013 7:20 PM, Loy wrote:
> I am having numerous stability problems with my main computer at home
> and it seems to be related to IE, but I don't seem to be having the
> problems on another computer I have. I have sent numerous error
> reports to GWMicro and Aaron said they were put in a cue and would be
> looked at.He also said a new maintenance update would be coming out
> soon. Sure hope they will be able to find the cause and fix it, I've
> got a
lot invested in Window Eyes.
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Vaughan Dodd"
> <[email protected]>
> To: "'DebandCori'" <[email protected]>;
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 9:03 PM
> Subject: RE: Thoughts on Window-eyes Stability
>
>
>> Whilst I am satisfied that I have improved the stability of my home
>> pc, I do have issues at work and I think that Deb - you have
>> summarised how it seems very succinctly.
>>
>> GW has lost its sharp customer focus; it used to be active in
>> describing how things work and why they don't.  Doug was very good in
this regard.
>> And yes: it is true that there are many thousands of pcs, with many
>> thousands of variations, running many thousands of copies of Window-eyes..
>> But we are lacking the reassurance from GW Micro that efforts are
>> being made to fix problems, and/or that there are workarounds which
>> they might wish to share with us.
>>
>> We are at the point where needed new features cannot reasonably
>> happen if there are instability issues which are proving complex to
resolve.  Thus:
>> my often requested enhances to braille support may well once again
>> fall off the priorities list.
>>
>>
>>
>> Vaughan.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: DebandCori [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, 9 April 2013 11:43 a.m.
>> To: Vaughan Dodd; [email protected]
>> Subject: RE: Thoughts on Window-eyes Stability
>>
>> Vaughn and all: I too, at work, at Citibank, have had a lot of the
>> same issues.
>> It is as if the Window-eyes folks, and the Sawgrass developers, and
>> my employer are not in sync with one another.
>> I have a lot of focus issues where things change by themselves
>> without warning, and, again, I am getting the 3 beep crashes again.
>> I am not a happy camper either.
>> Deb
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------
>> This email and any attachments may contain information that is
>> confidential and subject to legal privilege. If you are not the
>> intended recipient, any use, dissemination, distribution or
>> duplication of this email and attachments is prohibited. If you have
>> received this email in error please notify the author immediately and
>> erase all copies of the email and attachments. The Ministry of Social
>> Development accepts no responsibility for changes made to this
>> message or attachments after transmission from the Ministry.
>>
>> -------------------------------
>> If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original
>> sender only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and your
>> message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your
>> message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it.
>>
>> GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You
>> can manage your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.
>>
> If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original
> sender only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and your
> message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your
> message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it.
>
> GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You
> can manage your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.
>
If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only. 
If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to 
GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so 
the entire list will receive it.

GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can manage 
your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.



-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.2904 / Virus Database: 2641/6232 - Release Date: 04/08/13 If 
you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only.
If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to 
GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so 
the entire list will receive it.

GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can manage 
your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.


-------------------------------
This email and any attachments may contain information that is confidential and 
subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, 
dissemination, distribution or duplication of this email and attachments is 
prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify the author 
immediately and erase all copies of the email and attachments. The Ministry of 
Social Development accepts no responsibility for changes made to this message 
or attachments after transmission from the Ministry.

-------------------------------
If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only. 
If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to 
GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so 
the entire list will receive it.

GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can manage 
your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.

If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only. 
If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to 
GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so 
the entire list will receive it.

GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can manage 
your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.



If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only. 
If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to 
GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so 
the entire list will receive it.

GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can manage 
your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.


If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only. 
If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to 
GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so 
the entire list will receive it.

GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can manage 
your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.

Reply via email to