Nice one JO. See my comments below. erik burggraaf A+ certified technician and user support consultant. Phone: 888-255-5194 Email: [email protected]
On 2010-02-27, at 11:13 AM, Joe Orozco wrote: > all of this having been laid out, I think this > is a rare case of win/win. Customers on both sides will be pleased. The > Pac Mate Omni maintains the lead in terms of software, but this is owed to > Freedom Scientific using the Windows Mobile system. Physically, both the > QWERTY and BT versions are too darn big for either version to really be > called a notetaker. I agree, that and the fact of Fs developing a rep for producing poor quality and astoundingly high maintanance braille displays make them a poor contender here in our system. > Ultimately, I am choosing the BSP because: > > 1. Quieter keyboard > > 2. Easy menu structure > > 3. Multitasking > > 4. Great Internet experience and navigation > > 5. Ability to use BSP as a mobile disk and making ActiveSync optional rather > than mandatory > > Negatives of the BSP: > > 1. Leather case > > 2. Slight delay in completing saving, deletion and similar commands > > 3. Limited formatting features on the Word Processor To this I also want to add, 4, abominable support for jaws for windows in terminal mode, 5, lack of Imap and TLS support on the email front, 6, no access to the SDK as mentioned before. I loved your suggestion about magnet sealing the case in stead of the velcrow. I prefer an off the shelf note taker solution myself, and all the cases for them are magnet sealed. It's a very hip and modern thing to do. > > Joe Orozco If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, visit: http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv
