On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 09:48:51PM -0400, Owen Winkler wrote: [snip]
> Please don't take any of this as me saying that the existing logo > accomplishes all of what I like. It does not. But I'm not willing to > merely suffice with something else. Until it does those things or is a > particularly stand-out design, I think we should reserve our changes. > > I appreciate the effort on the logo so far. I don't mean to discourage > anyone from continuing, since few people share my opinion on this topic > anyway, and a good logo is likely to come from an unlikely place. What > I will do is provide what I'm looking for in a logo (above), and > hopefully shield myself against another influx of logos that just try to > look nice but not hold any meaning. I'll just point out that a couple have people have said positive things about our current logo in this thread, so I don't think you're alone. I think you absolutely hit the nail on the head in these last two paragraphs. Eventually, the logo will get a redesign, but I certainly don't think it's anything we need to hurry or rush into. -- Michael C. Harris, School of CS&IT, RMIT University http://twofishcreative.com/michael/blog IRC: michaeltwofish #habari --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
